it's been 6 days since my last blueberry muffin attempt (v5 lazy muffins), i was due for another muffin experiment. this time around, instead of 1/2 cup of buttermilk, i used 1/2 of whole milk. will this make any difference? i would find out. i mixed the softened butter (left out since yesterday) and sugar first. i don't have the capability to reduce the two ingredients to cream, but a little bit of mixing prevents butter chunks (which doesn't seem to hurt the recipe but i believe the muffins have a better final consistency if the wet ingredients are mixed properly). only then did i had the 2 eggs and a tsp of vanilla extract. i'm wondering if the vanilla is even necessary because i can't taste it at all. i found another nytimes recipe, "simple blueberry muffins," that don't use vanilla at all (it also called for melted butter and only 1/4 cup of sugar).

when i opened the oven to check after the 40 minutes mark, the muffins still looked a little raw, so i cooked it for another 10 minutes (my mother prefers a crispier crust anyway). the muffins rose to a typical amount, no more no less. i know if i had another cup of flour i can get a bigger crust, but that would make the muffins too dense. as soon as they were out of the oven, i packaged 4 of the muffins in a small lasagna tray, put them into a cardboard box padded with paper, then biked to the cafe to deliver them to my parents.
my parents had the day off today but was at the cafe to deliver my sister's godmother's tax returns (which i did last night). not only was she there but my 2nd aunt as well. besides the blueberry muffins (still warm from the oven), they also got to try the freshly squeezed orange juice. the muffins were soft, almost cake-like. i noticed the top portion of the muffin was a differently consistency than the lower part, not as dense, maybe less cooked, but still tasted fine. so as far as i'm concerned, there's no difference as to whether one uses whole milk or buttermilk in a muffin recipe. for my next attempt (v7) i'm going to use the fresh blueberries i bought from haymarket on saturday.


i got my father's help to drill a few more holes in the 2nd backyard tree stump, so i can apply the tree stump removal powder to accelerate the cellulose decomposition. this was something we should've down back in the fall, and not wait until late winter (that way we can plant new trees come spring). i would've done it myself, but there's an element of danger (power cord, fast drill) so it's best to have a spotter. we tried using the 1" and 3/4" auger drill bits but they just wouldn't bite into the wood. maybe they did when they were still new, but after using them for a while (to the point where they were smoking hot), they're not as sharp as they used to be. instead we used spade bits. they work much better and don't have the tendency to buck the drill as much as auger bits, but they don't have the depth of the augers (instructions said drill holes 10" deep, the spade bits can only sink 4-5" at best).
we initially used the 7/8" spade bit before it got too dull and we switched to a 3/4" bit. the middle of the stump produced some pink sawdust, which meant the stump hasn't dried up completely yet and still partially alive (edges of the stump produced yellow dried sawdust). after additional top holes were drilled (we'd already worked on this stump months ago, so there were some preexisting holes), we had smaller side holes to let in oxygen in case we ever wanted to burn out the stump. afterwards i poured some water into the holes. my father drilled some additional side holes in the other tree stump as well.

after dinner i rode home. the evenings felt a little more empty minus the winter olympics. i watched DC's legends of tomorrow (currently one of the best shows out there for scifi/fantasy nerds, feels like an american version of the time-traveling adventuring dr.who with just more fighting), then took a shower, then watched the good doctor.

